MAF sensors

Kikemec wrote: Haver I mean that there are ways and ways of saying things, it is obio that forums are to discuss, but there are ways of saying things, practical knowledge are good, theorists too, it does not make you better or worse only makes you different and with different skills, so if we debate it is with respect and without attacking others, you are wrong, you can be replaced by you. It seems that what you mean, they understand me not to enlarge so much, apart that every mechanic knows that you can take 100 years in this and you never stop learning new things, anyway it is not good Friendly, here nobody wins anything just people who want to solve doubts, there are no mentions or titles at stake, okis good luck and hugs for all.

I think that this issue is coming out of context and I am being recriminated just by providing specific and founded data and solutions, I would like some post where you aggregate or abuse someone.
I recognize that I will upload me when I read a post where they are cheerful or unconscious. Specific for this task without running the risk of deprogramming a BSI, an anti -ranque plant and even an ECM.
Speaking is very easy but who pays possible damage to the user by improper procedures, this I think is a responsibility of yours as a moderator and in many cases I have not seen that you do it, then I think someone has to do it, if I bother you to intervene correcting, I'm sorry and apologize but I see it in this way and I will not change it.
I would like you to explain the bad thing to communicate who is one regarding its training, I do not advertise with my profession, simply when it fits as in this case I notice it, in the same way that you have done it when in some post wakes your moderator condition. I never said it is better than anyone, it is bad to demonstrate the effort for an activity developed for more than fifty years ??? Almost a lifetime.
Do not worry about my emotional state, at my age I already exceed the states of my youth and my life is very quiet.
Do you think I am aggressive for putting an end to the discussion ???
Well, making a raconto of my activity in this forum where what was done for me were only concrete and founded contributions as I said and ended receiving these accusations the best will be retiring, thank you very much for allowing me to participate in all this time.

Pdta: Exemplary of aggression was what I received from Forist Bobracing that you have edited but that comes to read.

Charlypzz looks at this last post when reading it, it shows much more calm than the others I mean you want your same passion for this topic you can misinterpret and I have not edited anything, so in my post it says that we deal with respect anything against you my good really, I have no problems, it is not that I want to be It is not necessary to retire anything to do, I also love the subject since childhood, that's why I dedicated this to me, because this is not to become a millionaire as you can have realized hahaha, but I am really corduroy, you really do not have to leave, it was never my intention if I had been eliminated, but it is not the idea anyway, I always appreciate the criticism of the criticism.

Kikemec, nobility obliges and corresponds that from an answer to your last comment on the unfortunate episode we have had.
Although thinking about it, I am not sure if it was so unfortunate, since it sometimes even the disputes and altercations that may seem harmful to be obtained a positive part, what was discussed here was the product of situations that were being carried out in the forum in a rising way, before a consultation by a user it must be careful in terms of what is recommended or ensures and in any case if you have real knowledge, indicate the procedure to be carried out. Suggesting a very different idea and another is to say remove the fuse such, disconnect the battery, change the oil for one more dense, ect. Especially that many consultations are about vehicles of the year 98 onwards with computerized electronics.
The comment made by a forist that some think to add post and karmas may be true and from there that is written in some cases without foundation and in a risky way for the need, I refer to this when I consider it advisable to control what is put on if there is a possibility of complicating instead of solving, I know it is a very difficult and laborious task to moderate a forum and more in your case that does not know if someone accompanies you.
Finally I think these circumstances will make us all more careful when collaborating or trying solutions and here is the positive of what I referred to the principle about the altercation.
Ok. Kike we continue as if nothing had happened, greetings, Carlos.

It seems that this debate has been given or wants to give a significance that does not really have. A forista is wrong in her appreciation and has not enough to say "you were wrong", no, the thing has gone to the limit, it has been censored, vexed, stigmatized, humiliated, this signaling will harm not only it, also to some other forista who wants to intervene in a debate when the purpose of these is to learn from another participant or teach it, in the training of a teacher, he is inculpted. For not understanding, the student is taken by the hand and guided him where the instructor considers that he must be, here he has tried to impose a point of view at all costs, he is a bad advisor, superb, goes against the postulates of anything, especially teaching, a little humility never hurts, an apology to Hectorodrigo either: "Nobleness obliges"

I think you all are exaggerating a bit, although it is true that the tone was not correct, you can't talk about things as exaggerated as vexation or humiliation.

I think this debate has already gone far and everything good that could be extracted from it has already been mentioned (the differences between the different terms).

Many people have exposed their point of view but the truth is that the only person who should have complained is the interested party, that is Hector, who demonstrating an excellent education has not said anything at all.

From manualsdemecanica.com we want to apologize in case the tone has not seemed correct, I take the opportunity to indicate to all the forgings that it is not bad to correct constructively, that is, without expressions of the type "you are completely wrong" or similar. We must all learn a little from Wolfi who gave a correct explanation without disavowing anyone, that is what we are looking for in this forum, a debate from which the greatest possible knowledge can be extracted for all.

By the way, this is no criticism of Charlypzz, the truth is that I have the impression that his comment that he also has a phrase said without the slightest eagerness to criticize anyone, rather it seems like a warning for other possible users to not get confused by a post that is not accurate.

For the rest to prevent you from going back to the subject, I will close this post.

PD soon we will put the list of the new manuals that have risen in recent days, more than 80 from the previous update.