Toyota 1zz and his "connecting rod dance"

Hello everyone, Mr. Servilimit a pleasure to have it in the debate. On the calculation, it seems very ingenious, you when dividing RPM for 60 seconds, is calculating, although I understand, the revolutions that the crankshaft gives per second. Then my opinion is that you have to take into account the length of the race or distance remembered, because speed is distance traveled in a time. Also according to what I understand, the piston from PMS whose speed is approx zero (is detained), when the crankshaft broken, the piston accelerates, achieves its maximum speed and then be restless until it reaches at zero speed at PMI. For this reason when Ismael calculates the speed of the embol as it showed it above, I add that this calculation was an average speed between the point of greatest rapids of the piston (maximum speed) with those of zero motion upper dead point (PMS) or PMI (lower). With respect to the debate , in my opinion it is one of the best ways that the human being has had, not only technical things but not value ... Democracy for all ... greetings cordials.

Hello Fiat147.
You have the whole reason, when making the calculation in that way I got the rpm per second, but we are looking for speed: the race is 91.5 and in a revolution two ago, it means that it travels in that revolution 183 mm that multiplied by 106 gives us the average scored by UDS of 19.5 meters/sec on average, taking into account of slowdown in the changes of change of gear.
With this annotation it seems to me that the debate is prevented from becoming a mathematical subject and returning to the mechanical issue that is interested.
I apologize for the mistake.
Miguel

Hello everyone, Mr. Servilimit does not have to apologize to anyone, only the clarification because it was possible that Ishmael or I could be wrong. With respect to mathematics and mechanics, I present the second when sharing ideas, but sometimes it happens depending on the complexity of the phenomenon it is difficult to understand certain things without a good mixture of mattemetic and physical, by the way this is just my opinion ... greetings Mr. Miguel .

In any case, thank you, having contributed another way to make this fully valid and useful calculation for all. It is fulfilled that in every debate, a benefit always arises. Greetings!!!