carburecion vs. injection

Very good to all, here a debate open to all those who like and want to participate; The subject: the real efficacy and benefits of each of the two systems used in gasoline, injection or carbure engines, as well as their most common failures and their resolution .. in order to exchange experience and ideas to in the future "save money" when this type of faults will occur , I will begin by saying, that I do not understand well why the carburetor saying that emissions ... etc ... or were they looking to "move our pocket"? Greetings to all !!

Hello everyone, what a good theme proposed Mr. Ismael, technology of the old school, but in some cases fully in force, versus the modernity of electronics. I would like to hear everyone's opinion. greetings .

Hello everyone, I personally like the 2 system, according to my opinion they are different and each one solves similar problems when correctly feeding an engine.

Hello again! , if what you say is fine, but when failing, which is the most expensive? , Surely you would tell me that the injection saves you more fuel and all that, but of course; Do not talk to you about the following:

1-
to

diagnose
the
car ( they know how Components are very expensive and also, today, I continue to see the mess that there is mounted with the famous "little machine" because it seems that each one interprets different things and this is not normal , to say that even in official dealers they have mess ... to those who have happened to them that they have been dizzy, "they have nailed $$" and then; or the car is still the same, or another pod comes out and ... again to the workshop .. This did not happen with the carburetor, I have always said of this: you step on him and go (and do not think), he does not melt "none circuit", and his breakdowns ... Of one three times at most .. in the whole life of the car. What a business they have mounted, to throw numerous greetings !!

Hello everyone, Ismael53, with respect to the costs, if generally the electronic injection is more expensive to repair, the bad Ecu ... very much, but on top If you change new comes blank, therefore you have to reprogram it ... $$$, to according to you should not be like that ... with respect to point 1 to 6 I fully agree with you, however in my opinion those problems are unnestious to dark management at high economic levels and not to technology itself. I mean yes, the sensors are expensive, but for us. The manufacturer makes them for thousands to a fraction of the cost of sale to detail, it is not fine ... $$$, but for me it remains a more socio-economic problem that of the real value gives the technology itself.
With respect to the little machine, I imagine that you refers to a scanner , for my super useful when saving time in the diagnosis, each one will interpret the little machine as they can or want or fit your convenience and/or known, as in any order of things ...
of the carburetors, although they are simpler, in my case I have respect, especially systems monitored by depression Unidirectional, empty switching thermovalvules, many depression connections, TPS sensors, altitus correctors, automatic choke, etc., and do not offer any help to the Diagnostic type obd ....
mainly in any case I believe that the technological change Tine to do with an environmental theme. While a well -regulated career could be similar as to consume that a system of injection, in emissions not. Generally polluting 20 to 50 times more ... if you do not ask the poor Indians or Chinese, as their cities are plagued if they are currently todbia by carbureated vehicles. While I agree with you that the carburetor fulfilled almost all those restrained in my opinion insufficient before the modern standard in terms of environmental care, Uff is very hot by here, this planet is trying to communicate something, hopefully we can be able to disipline it before it is late ... slaudos to all.